<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>CongressDaily</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Plan to Nix Student Loan Program Sparking Major Battle | Congress Daily</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2009/plan_nix_student_loan_program_sparking_major_battle_congress_daily</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;There will be an intense amount of lobbying. It&#039;s just going to be a huge
fight,&amp;quot; said Stephen Burd, a senior fellow for education policy at the
nonprofit New America Foundation. Original article
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/stephen_burd/recent_work">Stephen Burd</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/579">Student Loans</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cecille Isidro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">11524 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Groups Urge Obama to Adopt National Broadband Strategy | CongressDaily/Nextgov</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/groups_urge_obama_adopt_national_broadband_strategy_nextgov</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
Underscoring the adage that politics makes strange bedfellows, AT&amp;amp;T, Cisco, Free Press, Google, New America Foundation, National Cable and ...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/560">Broadband &amp;amp; Community Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/561">Digital Future of Public Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/23">Wireless Future Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8901 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New America’s Event with Eric Schmidt in Congress Daily | &#039;Google CEO Touts Innovation Amid Economic Turmoil&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/new_america_s_event_eric_schmidt_congress_daily_google_ceo_touts_innovation_amid_economic_turmoil</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
Google CEO Eric Schmidt spoke to a crowd convened by the New America Foundation in Washington on Tuesday about the ways technology can help Barack Obama&#039;s administration and Congress address two of the biggest challenges ahead: generating short- and long-term economic and job growth that can help pull the nation out of financial turmoil, and restoring public trust in government. Schmidt, who chairs the foundation&#039;s board and is a member of Obama&#039;s transition team, said America &amp;quot;has the intellectual foundation, leadership and literally the people in the room not just to solve problems but build a better place.&amp;quot; LINK
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/eric_schmidt/recent_work">Eric Schmidt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cecille Isidro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8457 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Douglas Rediker in CongressDaily | &#039;Sovereign Fund Growth Blurs Traditional Roles&#039; </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/douglas_rediker_congressdaily_sovereign_fund_growth_blurs_traditional_roles</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...Combined sovereign wealth reached $3.5 trillion in 2007 -- the
largest generator being China, according to the firm. Russia and Kuwait
are next. And, according to recent news reports, two other countries
with substantial population and/or wealth -- Saudi Arabia and India
--are considering setting up sovereign wealth funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Douglas Rediker, co-director of the New America Foundation&#039;s Global
Strategic Finance Initiative, noted that sovereign funds derive their
assets from oil or trade imbalances that generate current reserves.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Traditionally over the years, we and the IMF have been advocating
that countries keep a significant amount of reserves to ensure they are
protected from a rainy day. These countries did exactly what we and
others advocated that they do,&amp;quot; Rediker said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But, he added, &amp;quot;at some point the reserves got so high&amp;quot; that the
involved governments felt the need to diversify these reserves. As a
result, &amp;quot;they are putting some of these into SWFs,&amp;quot; explained Rediker... LINK
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7483 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jason Delisle in CongressDaily PM | &#039;Senate Budget Would Boost Advance Approps By $4 Billion&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/jason_delisle_congressdaily_pm_senate_budget_would_boost_advance_approps_4_billion_0</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 Senate Budget Would Boost Advance Approps By $4 Billion (CongressDaily PM, subscription only) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
. . . &amp;quot;There&#039;s no reason to do it other than to increase spending,&amp;quot; said Jason Delisle, an education analyst at the New America Foundation. Backers &amp;quot;want the money by any means necessary, but the trade-off is the debate gets confused and the budget lacks transparency.&amp;quot;
   
Advance funding for education grew out of a timing quirk whereby the academic year usually spans parts of two fiscal years. Beginning in FY96, Congress began using advance appropriations to increase education funding for a given school year while technically staying within that fiscal year&#039;s discretionary spending cap, according to a New America report.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since then the gimmick has become wildly popular -- what started out as $1.3 billion in advance education funding in FY96 grew to $17 billion in FY08, the report notes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The New America report said the use of advance appropriations makes it difficult to compare actual year-over-year education funding totals. It can also cause problems in future years should budgetary circumstances change. . . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/education_funding">Education Funding</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6885 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New America&#039;s AMT Event Covered by CongressDaily</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/new_americas_amt_event_covered_congressdaily</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the New America Foundation had hoped to umpire a snarled dispute between Democrats and Republicans on fixing the alternative minimum tax, its hopes were not advanced at a seminar today featuring advocates for both sides. The two parties are at swords&amp;#39; points over whether to hike other taxes in order to offset an estimated $50 billion revenue loss if Congress decides to prevent the AMT from biting some 23 million additional income taxpayers this calendar year. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A panel of tax policy mavens -- Alex Brill of the American Enterprise Institute, Len Burman of the Tax Policy Center, Robert Carroll of the Treasury Department, Aviva Aron-Dine of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and former Rep. Bill Frenzel, R-Minn. -- all generally agreed that AMT is bad policy and should be radically altered or scrapped. But the immediate issue -- as NAF&amp;#39;s Maya MacGuineas, who also heads the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, observed -- was how to patch it up now. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On that score, House Majority Leader Hoyer insisted that the Democratic-controlled House&amp;#39;s recently passed remedy must, in the name of fiscal responsibility, prevail. It calls for offsetting tax increases to plug the hole that any fix&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2007/new_americas_amt_event_covered_congressdaily&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jerry Irvine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6403 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CRFB Applauds Conrad-Gregg Proposal for Medicare and Social Security</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/crfb_applauds_conrad_gregg_proposal_medicare_and_social_security</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Budget Chairman Conrad and ranking member Judd Gregg, R-N.H., recently proposed to &amp;quot;create a task force to recommend comprehensive legislation addressing expected shortfalls in the major entitlement programs,&amp;quot; such as Medicare and Social Security. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget endorses the Conrad-Gregg proposal and is listed as a supporter in Congressional Quarterly Today (September 18, 2007) and in National Journal&amp;#39;s CongressDaily (September 19, 2007). The Concord Coalition and GAO Comptroller General David Walker have also given praise to the proposal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To receive information on these two articles, please visit CQ.com and NationalJournal.com.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/901">Congressional Quarterly Today</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6014 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CongressDaily Quotes Maya MacGuineas on PAYGO</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/congressdaily_quotes_maya_macguineas_on_pay_go</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congressional Democrats are using the budget process to express their longstanding legislative priorities. But they are not guaranteeing all of them will make it into law.Roughly $150 billion to $160 billion over five years in new spending initiatives are outlined in the House and Senate budget resolutions that conferees will seek to iron out this month.That is on top of expensive tax breaks assumed in the budget such as a fix for the alternative minimum tax, which would cost $50 billion for this year alone and $1 trillion over the next decade.Ranging from expanding health insurance for low-income children to providing benefits for Filipino veterans of World War II, the measures reflect broadly popular proposals. But the numerous &amp;quot;reserve funds&amp;quot; promise action on those items only if commensurate offsets are found under new pay/go rules, which will require politically difficult tax increases or entitlement spending cuts...Maya McGuineas, president of the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said given political pressures, it was surprising pay/go has made it this far.&amp;quot;That said, it only gets harder from here,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s unlikely we make it through the entire process without any&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2007/congressdaily_quotes_maya_macguineas_on_pay_go&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5232 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michael Dannenberg on Student Loan Subsidies in CongressDaily</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/michael_dannenberg_on_student_loan_subsidies_in_congressdaily</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Banks and other private student loan providers are gearing up for battles on several fronts, including a fight against a possible congressional overhaul of a major loan program that would force companies to compete for business, and likely shrink their profit margins.Already reeling from the Bush administration&amp;#39;s FY08 budget proposal last month, which cuts lender subsidies by $11.2 billion to pay for a Pell Grant increase, private companies are also facing a threat from Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Kennedy, who might offer legislation to require them to compete in a bidding process for $47 billion in Federal Family Education Loans they offer each year.By forcing companies to bid to provide the 13.6 million FFEL loans, the government would no longer have to entice lenders by offering subsidies, which totaled $17 billion last year, proponents of this system say.Instead, lenders would try to propose the most attractive financial package to the government by offering lower interest rates and smaller fees, in the hopes of being awarded student loan contracts.&amp;quot;Right now, student loan subsidy rates are determined by congressional fiat,&amp;quot; said Michael Dannenberg, director of education policy at the New American&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2007/michael_dannenberg_on_student_loan_subsidies_in_congressdaily&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_dannenberg/recent_work">Michael Dannenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/579">Student Loans</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4999 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CRFB Featured in CongressDaily: &#039;Budget Reform, Yet Again&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/crfb_featured_in_congressdaily_budget_reform_yet_again</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a pretty low-key group. But with a board of directors as diverse as former OMB Director David Stockman and former House Budget Chairman Bill Gray, D-Pa., when the group talks, it&amp;#39;s probably worthwhile listening to them a bit. Maybe more than a bit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So budget writers might want to pay some attention to the committee&amp;#39;s evaluation of Senate Budget Chairman Gregg&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Stop Over Spending Act of 2006,&amp;quot; released last week. The title of the report pretty much sums it up: &amp;quot;A Good Start in Need of Balance.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You remember Gregg&amp;#39;s plan: It&amp;#39;s the budget overhaul proposal that includes line-item enhanced rescission, budget caps, sequestration, biennial budgeting, commissions, the kitchen sink, 2007 draft picks and a provision to be named later. Being the purists that they are, members of the Committee would much rather see Congress make the policy changes needed to bring the budget back to balance than adopt new rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;But given the polarized partisan environment and that it is an election year, improvements to budget process may be the best we can hope for,&amp;quot; they said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Gregg plan includes specific deficit targets enforced by law, and the Committee is happy about that.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2006/crfb_featured_in_congressdaily_budget_reform_yet_again&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/710">CongressDaily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3887 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
