<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Joe Mathews</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CA EVENT: Blockbuster Democracy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/blockbuster_democracy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
10/14/2008 - 8:00am&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
Ninety-seven years ago this month (October 1911), Californians -- egged on by Progressive reformers -- added the recall, the referendum, and the initiative to the state constitution. As California completes its first century of direct democracy and prepares to vote on another ballot crowded with measures, is it time to reform the reform?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Californians treasure the right to decide public policy questions at the ballot. But there is growing concern about how direct democracy broadly, and the initiative specifically, work in practice. Voters tell pollsters that money and interest groups have too much power in the initiative process. Voters often suggest they are confused about the true effects of proposed ballot measures. State legislative leaders say that their discretion is limited -- and attempts at long-term planning are defeated -- by the tendency of voters to make budget and spending decisions at the ballot. Local officials encounter a similar problem when it comes to issues of land use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been plenty of commentary about the problems with the initiative process. This event will offer ways to change it.
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_paul/recent_work">Mark Paul</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7954 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joe Mathews on KCRW | &#039;Which Way L.A.? - A Budget Finally Passes, but Schwarzenegger Says He&#039;ll Veto It&#039; </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/joe_mathews_kcrw_which_way_l_budget_finally_passes_schwarzenegger_says_hell_veto_it</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The longest budget stalemate in state history is not over yet. Governor Schwarzenegger says he&#039;ll veto the plan finally approved this week by both parties. He says it contains &amp;quot;fake budget reform&amp;quot; and makes the fiscal crisis even worse because &amp;quot;it kicks that can down the alley&amp;quot; into next year.
&lt;/p&gt;
Guests:
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt; Ed Mendel: Sacramento Bureau Chief for the San Diego Union Tribune
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Joe Mathews&lt;/strong&gt;: Irvine Senior Fellow, &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;
	&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt; Kevin Starr: Professor of History at the University of Southern California&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/ww/ww080917is_the_terminator_be&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; LINK to audio &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1107">KCRW</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:48:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8019 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California&#039;s Political Environment May Prove Too Toxic for Green Energy Propositions</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/californias_political_environment_may_prove_too_toxic_green_energy_propositions_7967</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It would seem that measures promoting renewable energy and alternative fuels
would be shoo-ins here where gas prices are among the nation&#039;s highest. Two
thirds of Californians polled say they want their state to be a leader in
advancing technologies that reduce pollution and combat climate change.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But a pair of ambitious ballot initiatives--Proposition 7 (aka &amp;quot;Big
Solar&amp;quot;) and Proposition 10 (&amp;quot;Big Natural Gas&amp;quot;)--designed to do
just that appear to be in trouble because of growing fiscal concerns. Prop 7
would require utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources
by 2025 and Prop 10 calls for a $5-billion bond, with most of the money
earmarked for&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/californias_political_environment_may_prove_too_toxic_green_energy_propositions_7967&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1462">Scientific American</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7967 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will There Be Powdered Wigs? </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/will_there_be_powdered_wigs_7975</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
California&#039;s elites are talking, and here&#039;s what they&#039;re saying: this
governor can&#039;t get things done, the legislature is hopeless, the entire
state government is dysfunctional. (OK, just because they&#039;re elites,
they&#039;re not wrong. These are Western Elites, not the dreaded Eastern
Elites who are being so, so, so unfair to Sarah Palin). The you know
what has hit the fan. The only way to fix this is top-to-bottom reform.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So let&#039;s have a constitutional convention.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What does your blogger think? Put the convention in some place nice
(Monterey, maybe, or how about Coronado?) and I&#039;m there, live blogging
every second. But while I hate to burst bubbles (OK, I&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/will_there_be_powdered_wigs_7975&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1463">Fox and Hounds Daily</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7975 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joe Mathews in San Jose Mercury News | &#039;California Budget 101: A Guide to What&#039;s Gone Wrong in Sacramento&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/joe_mathews_san_jose_mercury_news_california_budget_101_guide_whats_gone_wrong_sacramento</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;q&amp;amp;adropcap&quot;&gt;
Q Where did that two-thirds rule come from anyway?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A
Ironically, the idea came from Democrats in the 1930s, according to &lt;strong&gt;Joe
Mathews&lt;/strong&gt;, a senior fellow at the&lt;strong&gt; New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;. After a long
period in the minority, Democrats came into power and wanted some
protections in case they didn&#039;t remain there. Voters passed a
constitutional amendment with a number of budget reforms, including the
two-thirds rule for any budget that grew by 5 percent or more. Three
decades later, California voters approved a follow-up measure saying
that all budgets need to be passed by two-thirds of legislators before
heading to the governor&#039;s desk. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_10458028?nclick_check=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/51">San Jose Mercury News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7957 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Schwarzenegger&#039;s Recall Gamble</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/schwarzeneggers_recall_gamble_7867</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
California&#039;s
prison guards union, angry about years of contract and other battles with the
state government, announced a petition drive Monday to recall Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger. 

The governor&#039;s initial response was to denounce the effort as a threat designed
to secure the guards an unreasonable pay increase. &amp;quot;The state should not
spend more money than we take in, and their intimidation tactics will not make
me change my mind whatsoever, because I happen to not represent the [guards
union],&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;I represent the people of California.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
But, if the union&#039;s recall drive proves to be serious, the
wiser course for Schwarzenegger would be not&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/schwarzeneggers_recall_gamble_7867&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_reform">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7867 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joe Mathews in the Los Angeles Times | &#039;In the Political Battleground of Colorado, a Labor-Business Fight Is Raging&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/joe_mathews_los_angeles_times_political_battleground_colorado_labor_business_fight_raging</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It&#039;s fair to say that Colorado will be the center of ballot initiative
world in November,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Joe Mathews&lt;/strong&gt;, a senior fellow at the
nonpartisan &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, which follows voter initiatives.
&amp;quot;The business-labor [ones] likely will be the biggest, most bitter and
hard-fought ballot fight in the country.&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-initiatives17-2008aug17,0,4133579.story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7769 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Monterey Would Be a Cool Capital</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/why_monterey_would_be_cool_capital_7758</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: 12pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
California&#039;s elected leaders are sweating
out another summer of budget stalemate. Temporary state workers are hot under
the collar after losing their jobs, and the permanent employees may see their
paychecks cut. Commentators are heatedly blasting the lack of a budget and
recycling old ideas about how to change the state&#039;s budget process, none of
them politically viable.

What better way to lower the budget heat than to relocate state elected leaders
to someplace cool? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: 12pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
California
is a big state, and there&#039;s no particular reason that legislators have to
gather and negotiate a budget in hot and humid Sacramento. So here&#039;s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/why_monterey_would_be_cool_capital_7758&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7758 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There’s No Paying in Baseball</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/there_s_no_paying_baseball_7764</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This year’s Little League World Series, which began on Friday, is a lavish,
nationally televised American sporting event. At the site of the series in South Williamsport, Pa.,
there is a tent for the tournament’s corporate sponsors to show off their
products, an instant-replay system to decide close calls and a perfectly
groomed, two-stadium baseball complex. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For all of the tournament’s seductive gloss, Little League was born in
poverty. In 1938, Carl E. Stotz, a Williamsport
oil company clerk, lost his job when the business shut down the plant where he
worked. As Stotz explained in his 1992 autobiography, “A Promise Kept,” when he
wasn’t working the odd&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/there_s_no_paying_baseball_7764&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1159">New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7764 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joe Mathews on KCRW Radio | &#039;Can Governor Schwarzenegger Slash the Payroll to Keep a Promise?&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/joe_mathews_kcrw_radio_can_governor_schwarzenegger_slash_payroll_keep_promise</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Joe Mathews discussed California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state budget, on KCRW, an NPR station.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
(KCRW)--In the recall election against Gray Davis, Arnold Schwarzenegger promised to end the annual budget crisis once and for all. But once again this year there’s no state budget, and the revenue shortfall is 15 billion dollars. Schwarzenegger’s public opinion rating has dropped to 40% and the legislature’s is a lot lower than that. Now Schwarzenegger says he’s cutting the salaries of state workers—down to the federal minimum wage... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/ww/ww080724can_governor_schwarz&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to story&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1107">KCRW</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7636 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
