The Meaning of Obama
The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program, New America in California
There's little doubt that Barack Obama's redemptive message of change
grabbed Americans by the throat. After all, it's in times full of fear
and despair that people are hungry for hope. Obama's triumph and
victory speech were moving not only because they reminded us that this
country is based on the idea of possibilities but because, for at least
a moment, much of the nation believed that hope was reborn. And that
raises a question: Why are Americans so obsessed with hope?
The American dream -- anyone can succeed, second chances abound, we are
what we make ourselves -- is one way to define "hope." An October
survey by J. Walter Thompson revealed that 77% of Americans think the
American dream is part of what makes this country so dynamic. That
helps explain why 78% also agreed that the next president "needs to
breathe new life" into that dream. So hope is an inextricable part of
our national identity. Without it, most agree, America wouldn't be
America.
Historically, writers have ascribed this essential
idealism or optimism to the nation's awesome natural abundance and its
wide-open spaces, which have allowed for geographic -- and social --
mobility. In the 1780s, Hector St. John de Crevecoeur made the
connection between abundance and the incipient American culture of
aspiration: "There is room for every body in America; has he any
particular talent, or industry ... he exerts it in order to procure a
livelihood, and it succeeds." But as inspiring as that observation may
be, it doesn't cut to the heart of the matter. That's because the
greatest inspiration for hope is, well, fear. The fear of failure.
Think about it. Puritan dogma, from which much of American ideology
stems, held that those early migrants had been selected by God for "an
errand into the wilderness." When John Winthrop, aboard the Arabella as
it approached the New World, urged his flock to create "a city upon a
hill," his words were as much a warning as an exhortation. He believed
that the Puritans had entered into a covenant with God and that they
were ordained to establish God's kingdom and be an example to the
world. If they failed, he said in his famous 1630 sermon, "we shall
shame the faces of many of God's worthy servants and cause their
prayers to be turned into curses upon us till we be consumed out of
this good land whither we are going."
Fail, and you're damned. Add that to one other bit of bedrock Americanness -- that we're a "nation of immigrants" -- and voila, you get a people terrified of screwing up.
Why? Because even though throughout our history immigrants have been
some of the scrappiest and most resourceful of Americans, it's also
true that they tended to be people who had failed, for whatever reason,
to achieve in their home countries. We talk about immigrants striving
for the future. We forget that they're almost always running from their
failed pasts.
In the early 19th century, when Alexis de Tocqueville remarked that
"ambition is the universal feeling" in America, he also claimed that,
in the U.S., the rich as well as the poor were spurred to success by
"the most imperious of all necessities, that of not sinking in the
world."
It's not easy living in a future-oriented country whose
culture is based on the idea of mobility, rebirth and hope. Mobility
and the constant process of "becoming" breed insecurity. As historian
David M. Potter wrote in 1954, the more we believe in mobility, the
more we reject the idea that, high and low, each person has his or her
rightful place in society. "Whereas the principle of status affirms
that a minor position may be worthy, the principle of mobility, as
Americans have construed it, regards such a station as ... the proof of
personal failure." He goes on to say that "the denial of [set] status
deprives the individual of one of his deepest psychological needs" and
describes the "hazards and insecurities" of the fluidity of American
life.
Our national cult of hope, therefore, is a balm to soothe
our social and culture instability. We fetishize hope because it helps
us as we grasp at a favorable future. We wrap ourselves in it like no
other people in the world because we tell ourselves failure isn't an
option. We have no choice but to cheer when a president-elect tells us
we can put our hands "on the arc of history and bend it once more
toward the hope of a better day."
And we're right to cheer.
If America ever did fail to come up with future prospects, plans,
dreams and hopes, it would, in all the most important ways, surely
cease to exist.











