<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Next Social Contract: Latest Articles</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/995/articles</link>
 <description>Articles by Program for tabbed view on main program pages</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Jesse Helms Is Not Dead</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/jesse_helms_not_dead_7558</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Having devoted his career to shocking and outraging American liberals, the late North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms continues to provoke them from his grave. Progressive journals and blogs are full of Helms horror stories. How he tried to make Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun cry by singing &amp;quot;Dixie&amp;quot; in the Senate elevator. How he won reelection against a black opponent by means of an ad showing the hands of a white man who had allegedly lost a job because of affirmative action. How he never repented of his segregationist past, unlike Strom Thurmond and George Wallace.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
All quite true, quite horrifying&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/jesse_helms_not_dead_7558&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/58">Salon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_parties">Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7558 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Did Hillary Crack the Working-Class Code?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/did_hillary_crack_working_class_code_7283</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The tragedy of Hillary Clinton&#039;s campaign for the presidency is that only after she had effectively lost the Democratic nomination did she find a language and message that gave people a reason to vote for her beyond the claim that her nomination was inevitable. By that point, though, the day-to-day proxy war with Barack Obama was so relentless that even her supporters may have missed the subtle argument and language that could be her lasting contribution to progressive politics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While Clinton was winning primaries in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky, much attention was paid to the reasons that white working-class&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/did_hillary_crack_working_class_code_7283&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/772">The American Prospect Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7283 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McCain Is In For a Terrible Shock If He Wins</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/mccain_terrible_shock_if_he_wins_7261</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Britain’s Conservatives might be plotting a triumphant return to power but America’s Republicans are in a state of utter collapse. And it’s not just because the tide is turning after two terms of George W. Bush. For better or for worse, the Cameron Conservatives have adapted to a more culturally liberal, urban, diverse society. They have reconciled themselves to the welfare state in a way that Keith Joseph and Margaret Thatcher never did. Republicans, in contrast, are labouring under the illusion that America remains the yeoman democracy of yesteryear, full of plucky individualists. Slowly but surely, American politics is catching&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/mccain_terrible_shock_if_he_wins_7261&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/236">The Spectator (U.K.)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7261 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Does Not Change</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/what_does_not_change_7206</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The presidential primary process, over the years since Eugene McCarthy &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; New Hampshire by losing it in 1968, has evolved into such an elaborate analysis of expectations and sequence that, this year, it has finally imploded on itself. Every other Tuesday brings a new analysis of whether Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama has done better or worse than expected, is closing the gap or widening it. New measures are invented weekly -- this week, a version of the popular vote that excludes four states, but includes the invalid primaries in Michigan and Florida seems to have taken hold in the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/what_does_not_change_7206&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/772">The American Prospect Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7206 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s the Matter With Bitterness?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/whats_matter_bitterness_7050</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Behind the controversy over whether Sen. Obama&#039;s description of rural Pennsylvanians as &amp;quot;bitter&amp;quot; about their economic circumstances was condescending, there is another argument, one that&#039;s been lurking, unspoken, since the beginning of the Democratic campaign. It&#039;s a debate about the legacy and meaning of the last 16 years of the Democratic Party, and both candidates have said some highly provocative things, putting cards on the table that they&#039;ve been holding for months.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
First, Sen. Clinton. In the &amp;quot;Compassion Forum&amp;quot; Sunday night, she tried to depict Obama as comparable to the last two defeated Democratic nominees: &amp;quot;Large segments of the electorate concluded&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/whats_matter_bitterness_7050&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/772">The American Prospect Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7050 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama-ism Without Obama</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/obama_ism_without_obama_6944</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Whether he becomes president this year, sometime in the future, or never, Barack Obama will surely stand as a distinctive and surprising figure in our political history. Yet as the lens pulls back, individuals who at first seem uniquely transformative almost always come to be seen, more modestly, as reflections of their times, as products of trends and choices not of their own making. When Ronald Reagan was turning American politics on its head in 1980 and 1981, we saw Reagan, the man; today it is hardly revisionism to see Reagan as part of a long process of conservative reinvention&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/obama_ism_without_obama_6944&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6944 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democratizing Capital</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/democratizing_capital_6945</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Below is a longer version of the article published in The Nation. For the version appearing in The Nation, please click here.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Historical analogies are never exact. Yet many of the choices we have before us today are similar to ones that an earlier generation of progressives faced as the 1932 election approached. As we do today, the progressives of the 20th century confronted a society beset by a huge gap between classes and an economy laid flat by the bursting of the speculative excesses of the previous decade. To be sure, our economy is nowhere near Depression levels&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/democratizing_capital_6945&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/111">The Nation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/19">Global Middle Class Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_infrastructure">Public Infrastructure</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6945 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>America Still Works</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/america_still_works_6606</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyone who reads the serious press about the condition of the US might be excused for believing that the country is headed towards a series of deep crises. This impression is exacerbated by economic slowdown and by the presidential primaries, in which candidates announce bold plans to rescue the country from disaster. But even in more normal times there are three ubiquitous myths about America that make the country seem weaker and more chaotic than it really is. The first myth, which is mainly a conservative one, is that racial and ethnic rivalries are tearing America apart. The second myth,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/america_still_works_6606&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/60">PROSPECT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/asia">Asia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6606 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Economic Diversification</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/economic_diversification_6478</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Harry Markowitz’s 1952 essay Portfolio Theory broke new ground in developing ways to diversify financial portfolios. By the time he won the Nobel Prize nearly four decades later, countless financial innovations to help spread risk had been introduced, making the risks associated with investing more acceptable -- particularly to the American middle class. Sure the markets are taking a hit now, but those with diversified portfolios are certain to weather this downturn better than those without.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
U.S. economic public policy would benefit from a similarly innovative approach to managing risk. The economy is facing growing pains that go deeper than just&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/economic_diversification_6478&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/334">The Ripon Forum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/economic_insecurity">Economic Insecurity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6478 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Moral Equivalent of Optimism</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/moral_equivalent_optimism_6320</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may have noticed a recurring theme in this column: that there is a set of assumptions about political possibilities that date from the late 1970s and have led to the timidity of more recent liberal politics -- and that are overdue for questioning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here’s another: An unfinished challenge from the late 1970s involves the question of how to create a meaningful and successful politics suitable to what then-California Gov. Jerry Brown called &amp;quot;the era of limits.&amp;quot; In that first moment when the U.S. confronted the finitude both of fossil fuels and of America’s postwar economic hegemony, Brown and Jimmy Carter&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/moral_equivalent_optimism_6320&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6320 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t Throw Baby Bonds Out With Bath</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/dont_throw_baby_bonds_out_bath_6325</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For better or worse, America has a habit of conducting much of our policymaking through the presidential election process. This can be dangerous when meaningful reform efforts get trumped by volatile politics. Sure, we’d like campaign promises to mean something but it’s counter-productive if we let the consideration of good ideas get easily diverted into the gutter.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; A case in point was the recent discussion of Hillary Clinton’s Baby Bond proposal, which was quickly hijacked by partisan politics. That’s a shame because the idea of creating a system of children’s savings accounts has good politics behind it and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/dont_throw_baby_bonds_out_bath_6325&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reid_cramer/recent_work">Reid Cramer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/167">Providence Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6325 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Forget Easy Money</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/forget_easy_money_6089</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Countrywide Financial, the nation’s largest mortgage lender, has a curious new idea -- or, more precisely, an old one. No longer will it use wads of Chinese cash recycled through Wall Street to make subprime loans to unqualified borrowers. Instead, it will take in deposits from small savers and lend them out to people who might actually repay them -- just like that humble thrift institution president George Bailey did in It’s a Wonderful Life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imagine: a bank that promotes thrift! This could be the start of something big. Writing recently in the American Banker, Eugene Ludwig, a former comptroller of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/forget_easy_money_6089&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ray_boshara/recent_work_0">Ray Boshara</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/44">The Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/kids_accounts">Kids Accounts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 07:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6089 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Five Myths About Sick Old Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/five_myths_about_sick_old_europe_6070</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the global economy, today&amp;#39;s winners can become tomorrow&amp;#39;s losers in a twinkling, and vice versa. Not so long ago, American pundits and economic analysts were snidely touting U.S. economic superiority to the &amp;quot;sick old man&amp;quot; of Europe. What a difference a few months can make. Today, with the stock market jittery over Iraq, the mortgage crisis, huge budget and trade deficits, and declining growth in productivity, investors are wringing their hands about the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, analysts point to the roaring economies of China and India as the only bright spots on the global horizon. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; But what about&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/five_myths_about_sick_old_europe_6070&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1102">Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/welfare">Welfare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6070 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Investment Works</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/public_investment_works_5903</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An important debate over fiscal policy is beginning to take place within the Democratic Party. For the past 15 years, deficit hawks within the party have argued that addressing America’s fiscal challenges should take priority over our public investment needs, suggesting that, in effect, we cannot afford to increase public investment until we have reduced the federal deficit. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; But there is an alternate view, holding that the deficit hawk position neither accurately reflects America’s true economic strength nor represents good policy in light of the very significant changes that have occurred in the economy over the past decade&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/public_investment_works_5903&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/bernard_l_schwartz/recent_work">Bernard L. Schwartz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/664">Democracy: A Journal of Ideas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_infrastructure">Public Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5903 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Share the Credit</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/share_credit_5831</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The Democrats are a potential majority party in need of a major idea with potential. The major idea that built a Republican majority starting with Ronald Reagan&amp;#39;s election was simple: cutting income taxes, with or without cuts in spending. The Republicans reduced income tax rates and then they cut big holes in those rates by creating new or enlarged tax credits available only to Americans who pay income tax. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Meanwhile payroll taxes have risen for working Americans who, because they pay little or no income tax, are ineligible for a range of tax breaks from the $1,000-a-year child&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/share_credit_5831&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 08:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5831 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Thirty-Year Itch</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/thirty_year_itch_5584</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve always resisted the idea that there is &amp;quot;an inherent cyclical rhythm in our national affairs,&amp;quot; as the late Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. put it. Schlesinger suggested that American history moves in 30-year cycles between liberalism and conservatism, between public and private concerns. But it’s hard not to notice that it was exactly 30 years ago that the conservative era dawned, with the introduction of the then-audacious Kemp-Roth tax-cut proposal, in 1977, followed by California’s tax-limiting Proposition 13 the next year. Also in those two years, a freshman Utah senator named Orrin Hatch led a 19-day filibuster that brought down&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/thirty_year_itch_5584&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5584 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to Hit the Trifecta</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/how_hit_trifecta_5724</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rising insecurity in the oil producing regions of the world along with rising carbon levels in the atmosphere are pushing Congress to update our nation’s energy policies. But far from providing a bold solution to our converging environmental, energy and security dilemmas, the bill that has come out of the Senate to gradually increase fuel efficiency standards relies on timid half-measures. Congress should instead consider a more effective and long-overdue step towards energy independence and environmental protection -- implementing a broad-based energy tax. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly, U.S. energy policies need reforming. Oil-producing nations hold too much sway over our pocketbooks and our&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/how_hit_trifecta_5724&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/adam_carasso/recent_work">Adam Carasso</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/577">Washingtonpost.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5724 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bloomberg Tackles Poverty</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/bloomberg_tackles_poverty_5511</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even for public servants with the best of intentions, the seeming intractability of poverty in America can be awfully discouraging. Its causes are complex and past efforts have met with limited success. Until Hurricane Katrina hit land, poverty had been absent from the public agenda for so long that there was little consensus among policymakers in how to respond. Not only was the toolbox of effective antipoverty proposals empty but partisan gamesmanship often seems to block innovative, good faith efforts to address it.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet persistent, concentrated, and intergenerational poverty remains a scourge upon our prosperous society, an enduring challenge&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/bloomberg_tackles_poverty_5511&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reid_cramer/recent_work">Reid Cramer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/334">The Ripon Forum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/poverty">Poverty</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5511 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Next Social Contract</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/next_social_contract_5393</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The initial round of presidential primary debates leaves no doubt that the presidential horserace has already broken from the gates. While some may lament the early departure -- given that votes will not be cast for another 8 months -- the absence of incumbents vying for each party’s nomination has created a wide open race, one where the stakes are remarkably high.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although most of the press coverage to date has focused on the daily stream of polls, jibes, and behind-the-scenes intrigue, the coming election represents our first real chance to remake the social contract for the 21st century. Our nation’s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/next_social_contract_5393&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ray_boshara/recent_work_0">Ray Boshara</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reid_cramer/recent_work">Reid Cramer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/577">Washingtonpost.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5393 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Create a College Access Contract</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/create_a_college_access_contract_5103</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;America’s financial-aid system provides too much taxpayer support to banks that make college loans, asks too little of students who assume them, and burdens families with too much debt. We need to rethink the system in order to improve college access and affordability. Federal higher-education policy largely fails to reward rigorous college-preparatory work in high school. It penalizes students who hold jobs while in college. Lenders make extraordinary profits, while young people leave college burdened with debt and, more often than not, without the degree or skills necessary to repay it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new  &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/create_a_college_access_contract_5103&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_dannenberg/recent_work">Michael Dannenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/820">The Chronicle of Higher Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/579">Student Loans</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/education_funding">Education Funding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5103 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
