<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program: Latest Publications</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/25/pubs</link>
 <description>Articles AND Policy Papers by Program for tabbed view on main program pages</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Engaging Cuba on Human Rights</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/engaging_cuba_human_rights_20032</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Normalization of U.S. relations with Cuba was widely seen as exactly
the kind of high-value, low-hanging fruit that would be ideal for a
president elected under the banner of &amp;quot;change.&amp;quot; But a scathing new
Human Rights Watch (HRW) report, &amp;quot;New Castro, Same Cuba,&amp;quot; will make
lifting sanctions against the Castro regime -- on travel, remittances,
trade -- more difficult for President Obama. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/engaging_cuba_human_rights_20032&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jorge_casta_eda/recent_work">Jorge Castañeda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/78">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/cuba">Cuba</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20032 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Right Role For Sarah Palin</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/right_role_sarah_palin_19999</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
When Sarah Palin resigned on July 4th weekend, it certainly looked
as though she had decided to abandon politics, or at the very least
given up on running for president in 2012. And despite the saturation
coverage of Palin&#039;&lt;em&gt;s Going Rog&lt;/em&gt;ue book tour, it&#039;s not obvious
that she hasn&#039;t. As Republican political strategist Patrick Ruffini has
observed, a Palin presidential run would have profited from releasing
the book a year from now, maximizing media exposure in the crucial year
before Iowa. Granted, John McCain also capitalized on his political
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/right_role_sarah_palin_19999&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/52">National Review Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19999 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colleges Need a Lemon Law</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/colleges_need_lemon_law_19904</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The College Board reports tuition is up 9 percent this year in
inflation-adjusted terms, despite declining prices throughout the
economy and stagnant median family income. Parents want to know why the
rise and why college costs so much in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The answer, in a word, is demand. Until we channel the demand for
higher education in a more rational direction, tuition will continue to
outpace inflation, grant aid, and family income.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/colleges_need_lemon_law_19904&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_dannenberg/recent_work">Michael Dannenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/133">The Times Union (Albany, N.Y.)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19904 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where Stupak Leads</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/where_stupak_leads_19897</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week, the debate over the Democratic health reform effort took
a brief and unexpected philosophical turn. Bart Stupak, a pro-labor
Catholic Democrat representing Michigan&#039;s 1st congressional district,
managed to pass the Stupak amendment as part of the House health bill.
Sensing that an insurrection among anti-abortion Democrats threatened
to derail the legislation, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi,
who ardently opposes restrictions on abortion, allowed Stupak to offer
the amendment, and it passed by a wide margin thanks to Republican
votes. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/where_stupak_leads_19897&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1514">Forbes.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19897 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>China&#039;s Upper Hand</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/chinas_upper_hand_19933</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
To hear the Obama administration tell it, the problem with American
foreign policy towards China is that we haven&#039;t been paying enough
attention. In the weeks and months leading up to the President&#039;s
arrival in Beijing, a bevy of administration officials implied that the
Bush administration had become so preoccupied with the Middle East that
it gave China free reign to expand its influence in Asia. Now, by
sending Obama to the continent in his first year -- after sending Hillary
Clinton there on her first foreign trip-Team Obama is trying to signal
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/chinas_upper_hand_19933&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_beinart/recent_work">Peter Beinart</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1879">The Daily Beast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19933 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
