<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Annette Nellen: All Publications, Events and Press</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/content/731/all</link>
 <description>All content by a given person, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Closing Tax Gap</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/closing_tax_gap_7752</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since the early 1980s, there has been a plethora of recommendations about
how to reduce the tax gap. Many changes have been enacted, yet the gap grows.
Proposals requiring additional information reporting or withholding are usually
overlooked despite evidence that these techniques result in a low tax gap for
wage earners. However, a significant information reporting rule was enacted in
2008. Its enactment though, seems to be more a result of its revenue potential
than its role in a comprehensive tax gap reduction strategy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Below, we&#039;ll review the tax gap and the recently enacted credit card
information reporting provision, and explain reasons for the slow approach.
&lt;/p&gt;
Tax Gap History
 &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/closing_tax_gap_7752&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1057">AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7752 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Grabbing Remote Vendors</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/grabbing_remote_vendors_7679</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As far back as 1872, when Montgomery Ward issued its first mail-order catalog,
vendors have sold to customers without being physically present in the
customer’s state. Although sales taxes have existed since the 1920s, we have no
effective system for collecting sales-and-use tax on sales by remote sellers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Today we’ll look closer at the history of the remote sales tax issue,
clarify New York’s
law change and note possible solutions.
&lt;/p&gt;
Interstate Sales Tax History
&lt;p&gt;
As a 1965 congressional report noted: “The present system of State taxation
as it affects interstate commerce works badly for both businesses and the
States.” (State Taxation of Interstate Commerce Report No. 952, 9/2/65, Vol. 4,
(the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/grabbing_remote_vendors_7679&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1057">AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7679 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Tax Commission for California? How It Can Be Made to Work</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/tax_commission_california_how_it_can_be_made_work_7651</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Both Governor
Schwarzenegger and Assembly
Speaker Bass have stated that they would like to form a bipartisan
commission to find ways to improve California’s
tax system. They seek to modernize our tax system, make the state more
economically competitive, and have a system that produces stable revenues.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
These are great goals. California’s
tax system was designed decades ago in a manufacturing era when borders were
important and tangible goods ruled. Our tax system was not designed for the
current information age with its mobile capital, worldwide-based workforce, and
goods and services transferable over the Internet. Serious work is needed to
bring our tax system into the 21st century.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A tax&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/tax_commission_california_how_it_can_be_made_work_7651&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/930">California Progress Report</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7651 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rethinking IRAs</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/rethinking_iras_7603</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A Department of  Labor retirement guide
notes: “For many Americans, retiring in this new century is a mystery.”
They’re living longer, they’re more personally responsible for their
own retirement savings and they have many more savings options than
previous generations did, which exacerbate the confusion. In June 2008,
a House Ways and Means Subcommittee hearing
explored options for expanding IRA participation. This article presents
data about the mystery and IRA participation, highlights of the hearing
and considerations for reform.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For general  information about IRAs see IRS  Publication 590 (PDF) and IRS FAQs.
&lt;/p&gt;
Data

	In 1974 when IRAs were created, &amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/rethinking_iras_7603&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1057">AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7603 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California&#039;s Tax Loopholes That Aren&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/californias_tax_loopholes_arent_7696</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The package of six tax increases that passed in the Budget Conference
Committee this week includes two described as loophole closers. Who can argue
against closing a loophole? Unfortunately, the two provisions proposed to be
changed aren&#039;t loopholes. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A loophole is the ability to use a rule in an unintended way. It may be due
to poor wording or an incomplete definition in the law. For example, assume a
state has a lower property tax rate for agricultural land to help farmers.
However, the definition of agricultural land is so broad that the owner of a
residence on 10 acres just needs to plant 20 fruit trees&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/californias_tax_loopholes_arent_7696&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/70">The San Diego Union Tribune</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7696 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taxing Some Services Could Help if It&#039;s Fair and Simple</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/taxing_some_services_could_help_if_its_fair_and_simple_7461</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
California State Board of Equalization Chair Judy Chu believes it is time to address our deficit and modernize our sales tax by applying it to services. Her call to modernize our sales tax would be a good start in addressing an underlying cause of our budget problems.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Taxing services is not an outlandish idea. Most states already tax more types of services than does California.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Taxing services is also not a bad idea. Lifestyle changes have led us to spend less on goods subject to California sales tax and more on non-taxable services. For example, two-earner households have greater needs for laundry&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/taxing_some_services_could_help_if_its_fair_and_simple_7461&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/51">San Jose Mercury News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7461 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not Flat</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/not_flat_7439</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
PL 86-272 provides that if the only in-state activities a business has is the solicitation of orders for tangible personal property that is approved and filled from outside the state, the state may not impose a net income tax on the business. States set the rules, within due process and commerce clause constraints of the U.S. Constitution, for businesses that sell services or intangibles.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
States tend to take broad approaches. A 2007 Illinois Department of Revenue ruling notes that &amp;quot;as a general rule, the Department interprets the concept of nexus as broadly as possible (No. IT 07-0033&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/not_flat_7439&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7439 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gross Receipts Taxes</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/gross_receipts_taxes_7240</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In recent years, concern over declining corporate tax collections, aggressive tax planning and state revenue needs have led a few states to consider and even enact a gross receipts tax (GRT) on companies that do businesses within its borders. On the surface, a GRT is simple since it allows no deductions. The broad base allows for a very low rate that can make the tax more palatable. Further, all businesses are typically subject to the GRT, with the result that all businesses contribute something to state coffers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yet, many oppose the GRT because of its inherent flaws, one being that it&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/gross_receipts_taxes_7240&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7240 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Goodbye State Tax Deduction</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/goodbye_state_tax_deduction_7243</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 1984 Treasury Department report (PDF) that laid the foundation for the base broadening and rate reductions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, called for complete repeal of the itemized deduction for state and local taxes. Citing similar reasons, the 2005 final report of the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform also called for repeal. Yet, there are also proposals to make permanent the ability to deduct either state income or sales tax (for example, HR 3592, 110th Congress).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Below we’ll get some background on the state and local tax deduction and then&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/goodbye_state_tax_deduction_7243&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1236">The AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7243 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gross Receipts Taxes</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/gross_receipts_taxes_7246</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Recent tax reform efforts in Ohio, Texas and Michigan have led to an increase in the number of states imposing gross receipts taxes (GRT). Let&#039;s take a closer look at GRT and some important legal issues surrounding it.
&lt;/p&gt;
Overview
&lt;p&gt;
The Multistate Tax Compact defines a GRT as &amp;quot;a tax, other than a sales tax, which is imposed on or measured by the gross volume of business, in terms of gross receipts or in other terms, and in the determination of which no deduction is allowed which would constitute the tax an income tax&amp;quot; (Article II (PDF)).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In 2005, Ohio enacted a&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/gross_receipts_taxes_7246&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7246 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Taxes And Tax Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/new_taxes_and_tax_policy_7248</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In recent years, there have been enactments and proposals for a variety of new taxes at both the U.S. state and local levels. A key impetus for these changes is the need for more revenue to fund state and local governments. While existing taxes could be increased to generate revenue, other sources have been considered for a variety of reasons. This article looks at a few recent examples and how they stack up under the principles of good tax policy.
&lt;/p&gt;

Examples
&lt;p&gt;
Sources of new tax revenue are sometimes tied to activities that lawmakers believe may have some type of adverse social policy&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/new_taxes_and_tax_policy_7248&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1236">The AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7248 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The 50th Anniversary Of Public Law 86-272</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/50th_anniversary_public_law_86_272_7249</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Public Law 86-272, addressing circumstances under which a multistate business may owe state income taxes, was enacted as a stopgap measure on September 14, 1959. For the past several years, efforts to reform this law have raised issues similar to those of 1959. This article provides a brief history and the issues surrounding PL 86-272 and poses the question -- when the 50th anniversary milestone is reached, will PL 86-272 be in its historic form or a new form (and what might that be)?
&lt;/p&gt;

1959 Supreme Court Decision
&lt;p&gt;
In February 1959, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Northwestern Cement v.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/50th_anniversary_public_law_86_272_7249&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7249 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t Link School Spending To Oil Companies&#039; Profits</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/dont_link_school_spending_oil_companies_profits_6934</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week, a bill was proposed by a majority of Assemly Democrats to impose extra taxes on oil companies to help prevent pink slips for teachers. A March 12 vote, mostly along party lines, failed to garner the required two-thirds majority for passage of a tax increase.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez has said he does not plan to give up on the idea.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Despite the importance of not laying off teachers, failure to pass was a good result. The bill, ABX3 9, is not the solution for keeping teachers employed or solving California&#039;s budget problems.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Budget problems cannot be solved with taxes&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/dont_link_school_spending_oil_companies_profits_6934&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/51">San Jose Mercury News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6934 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Annette Nellen in Orange County Register | California Lawmakers Want to Tax Downloads</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/annette_nellen_orange_county_register_california_lawmakers_want_tax_downloads</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1999326.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;California Lawmakers Want to Tax Downloads (&lt;em&gt;Orange County Register&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Democrats would revise the definition of what&#039;s taxable instead of proposing a new tax that requires GOP support. . . 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So what do you think will happen with downloads?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;You&#039;re just going to have a bigger use tax problem,&amp;quot; admits &lt;strong&gt;Annette Nellen&lt;/strong&gt;, a San Jose State tax professor who nonetheless supports taxing downloads.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nellen likes the tax, in part, because increasing revenues isn&#039;t her biggest concern – rationale tax policy is. A fellow at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, Nellen has been urging the state to broaden its sales tax because she says a &amp;quot;consumption tax&amp;quot; should tax all the things we consume – goods and services, products and downloads.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Our tax base hasn&#039;t kept up with how we do business and how we live,&amp;quot; she said, and that means state revenues will naturally dwindle unless something is done.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The way we consume things have changed, but we still have a 1930s tax base,&amp;quot; she said. . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/876">The Orange County Register</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6927 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s Your Tax System IQ?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/whats_your_tax_system_iq_6896</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While tax season tests our technical tax knowledge daily, here is an opportunity to take a break and test your knowledge about our federal tax system.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Answers to this quiz can be found at the bottom of this article. 
&lt;/p&gt;

Questions


	IRS tax revenue collections for fiscal year 2006 were approximately $______ trillion. 
	The individual income tax was the largest portion of these tax collections, representing ___% of the total. 
	For 2005, _____ million individual tax returns were filed showing combined taxable income of $_____ trillion. 
	
		108; 2.8 
		124; 3.5 
		134; 5.1 
		149; 6.8 
	
	
	For&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/whats_your_tax_system_iq_6896&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1236">The AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6896 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obstacles To Taxing Services -- Are They Insurmountable?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/obstacles_taxing_services_are_they_insurmountable_7251</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
State sales tax bases have traditionally included only tangible personal property. Often services are either ignored completely in describing the tax base, or a small number of services are specifically targeted as legally taxable. One reason for exclusion is historical. Tangible personal property was the main consumption item back in the 1930s when many states started imposing a sales tax. However, in the past two decades, consumption of services has become significant.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since 1990, the Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA) has tracked the number and types of services taxed in each state. Of the 168 services tracked, Hawaii, New&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/obstacles_taxing_services_are_they_insurmountable_7251&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7251 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA Event: How Do/Should We Tax?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/california_event_how_do_should_we_tax</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
02/27/2008 - 8:30am&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
California has a tax system largely fixed in place during the Great Depression, in an industrial economy-setting unconcerned with environmental sustainability. Two questions about this tax system are posed here: First, can California find ways to raise the revenue it needs in the 21st century that are a better fit with our high-tech, service-based economy than is the current system? Second, can California&#039;s tax/fee structure be used to meet the state&#039;s greenhouse gas emissions under its AB 32 guidelines?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On Feb. 27, 2008, the New America Foundation and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uccs.universityofcalifornia.edu/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;University of California Center in Sacramento&lt;/a&gt; hosted a half-day conference with experts discussing these pressing questions. An MP3 audio recording of the full event, as well as presentation materials and conference articles released at this event, are available below.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/leif_wellington_hasse/recent_work">Leif Wellington Hasse</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_paul/recent_work">Mark Paul</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/557">Audio</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/nafcal022708a.mp3" length="27241641" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6727 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tough Tax Questions for Presidential Candidates</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/tough_tax_questions_presidential_candidates_6800</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The current crop of Presidential candidates sound a lot like they did in prior years with promises of new targeted tax breaks, loophole closures, increased taxes on the rich and new spending programs. Have the candidates not read the doom and gloom budget reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and others? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The fiscal agenda for the next President and Congress must include some very difficult decisions that go beyond just tweaking the tax system. Below, we’ll look closer at some key fiscal issues that have tax implications. Questions are posed that could help gauge how&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/tough_tax_questions_presidential_candidates_6800&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1236">The AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6800 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Spending Problem?&#039;  Some of it&#039;s Hidden in our Tax Laws</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/spending_problem_some_its_hidden_our_tax_laws_6804</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger&#039;s diagnosis of California&#039;s $14.5 billion budget shortfall: a &amp;quot;spending problem.&amp;quot; His remedy: 10 percent across-the-board spending cuts. What about a second opinion?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A spending problem is a chronic condition that warrants more than unfocused across-the-board cuts. Eliminating unnecessary spending would be a more reasonable and lasting treatment. The first step is identifying that wasteful spending -- not always an easy task. The task is made even trickier when some of it is hidden in our tax laws. Removing the spending waste in our tax laws can provide partial relief for our spending problem, reduce the chance of recurrence&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/spending_problem_some_its_hidden_our_tax_laws_6804&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/274">San Francisco Chronicle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6804 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Corporate Tax Under the Microscope</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/corporate_tax_under_microscope_6810</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
S corporations now account for two-thirds of U.S. corporate tax returns (see NTA report) and while designed for simplicity, they’ve become increasingly complex and harder for regulators to standardize and monitor. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the number of small businesses has exploded, the number of S corporations formed has more than quadrupled since the last review (of 1984 returns) while the number with assets exceeding $10 million has increased 10-fold. Today’s S corporations are not necessarily small, and not necessarily easy to classify for tax reporting purposes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In fact, the National Taxpayer Advocate’s (NTA) 2007 Annual Report to Congress (January 2008) identifies&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/corporate_tax_under_microscope_6810&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1105">AICPA Corporate Taxation Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6810 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
