<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Steven Hill: All Publications, Events and Press</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/content/425/all</link>
 <description>All content by a given person, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Electoral Games People Play</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/electoral_games_people_play_8157</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
The realm of electoral system design is still a fairly
esoteric branch of political science in the United States--unfortunately so,
since no single detail has a greater impact on the quality of representative
government. The choice of an electoral system affects which candidate gets
elected and all other aspects of a representative democracy, including the
number of viable political parties, the quality of campaigns, voter
participation levels, the role of campaign finance, legislative policy and
more. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
But despite the central importance of electoral system
selection, the subject has never received much attention in the United States,
especially compared with such topics as the role of money, term&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/electoral_games_people_play_8157&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1492">American Scientist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections">Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8157 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Let the Citizens Gather to Decide on State Reforms</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/let_citizens_gather_decide_state_reforms_8016</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
All reform proposals for making California
government more representative and responsive face the same obstacle:
Entrenched interests, including lawmakers, who benefit from the status quo.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The best means for overcoming those interests is a citizens assembly, a body
of approximately 160 average citizens -- randomly selected like a jury pool to
ensure diversity and impartiality -- empowered to formally propose electoral
reforms via a statewide referendum to their fellow voters.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The citizens assembly members study political reform recommendations for
nine months, listening to experts and holding public hearings. Then they vote
on which reforms to place directly on the ballot. Unlike a constitutional
convention, a citizens assembly&#039;s mandate is not&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/let_citizens_gather_decide_state_reforms_8016&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/110">The Sacramento Bee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/34">Citizens Assembly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8016 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> China&#039;s Robber-Baron Ways</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/chinas_robber_baron_ways_7963</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Only a short time after China&#039;s
magnificent Olympic coming-out party, the land of Mao&#039;s
successors found itself making less celebratory news.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Tainted Milk Formula Sickens Thousands of Chinese Infants&amp;quot; read
one of many recent headlines. Twenty-two companies that produce or distribute
milk powder had been secretly adding melamine, normally used for making
plastics and glue, into milk powder, making thousands of infants sick and
causing several deaths.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It is one of the puzzling questions about China: How can a country that
organized such a splendid Olympic splash be the same country that produces
deadly food scares on a regular basis?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The answer says a lot about today&#039;s China. In its March to modernity, Beijing&#039;s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/chinas_robber_baron_ways_7963&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/250">International Herald Tribune</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7963 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>China and the Long Road Ahead</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/china_and_long_road_ahead_7898</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During the Olympics, China showed the world that it can throw a heck
of a coming out party. But traveling here afterward, one sees the many
complexities and challenges facing this vast and ancient land. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Especially in the rural areas--where most people still live--the
impressive economic rise of China has penetrated only superficially.
True, the Communist Party, which still runs nearly everything, brought
electricity and other development here in the early 1980s. But while
some appliances like television and telephones are increasingly common,
indoor plumbing, electric ovens and other comforts are still scarce. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The life of farming families is still extremely poor, filled with
backbreaking labor and scavenging for&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/china_and_long_road_ahead_7898&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1445">The World Policy Blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7898 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in the Washington Examiner | &#039;Use of Public Finance Dollars Raises Concerns&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_washington_examiner_use_public_finance_dollars_raises_concerns</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...Advocates of public campaign financing were worried the money would not be there for candidates in future years.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
“You are setting a precedent of making this a slush fund to fund your favorite projects,” said &lt;strong&gt;Steven Hill&lt;/strong&gt;, director of &lt;strong&gt;Political Reform&lt;/strong&gt; at the nonprofit &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/a-1480874%7EUse_of_public_finance_dollars_raises_concerns.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/365">The Washington Examiner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7555 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill on KCBS | &#039;SF May Use Election Funds to Balance Budget&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_kcbs_sf_may_use_election_funds_balance_budget</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
...”There is a red line around that fund. There is a locked box; you may
not go into it, that’s the principal here,” said &lt;strong&gt;Steven Hill&lt;/strong&gt; of the
&lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;... &lt;a href=&quot;http://podcast.kcbs.com/kcbs/1200204.mp3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK for audio&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1399">KCBS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7576 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in the Washington Times | &#039;Cuts Urged in Political Ambassadorships&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_washington_times_cuts_urged_political_ambassadorships</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The American Academy of Diplomacy sent letters to the two presumptive
presidential candidates last week, proposing several criteria for
choosing non-career ambassadors, including foreign affairs experience,
communication and persuasion skills, and leadership abilities... 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...&amp;quot;It might be perfectly fine in today&#039;s climate, where you can raise
more money over the Internet than ever before,&amp;quot; to make a pledge such
as the one the academy has called for, said &lt;strong&gt;Steven Hill&lt;/strong&gt;, director of
the &lt;strong&gt;Political Reform Program&lt;/strong&gt; of the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;With Barack Obama raising so much money over the Internet, it might
be easier for him to agree to something like this, because perhaps he&#039;s
not as dependent on large donors who want that kind of quid pro quo,&amp;quot;
Mr. Hill said... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/02/candidates-urged-to-cut-non-career-ambassadors/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/102">The Washington Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections">Elections</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7480 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Save SF&#039;s Campaign Finance Program</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/save_sfs_campaign_finance_program_7494</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In 2000, San Francisco voters approved a system of public financing of campaigns for the Board of Supervisors, which in 2006 was expanded to the mayoral race. By eliminating the need for candidates to raise large amounts of private money, the program has been extremely successful at helping sever the link between big money and political decisions. But now this flagship program is threatened: Mayor Gavin Newsom is proposing to raid several million dollars from the public campaign fund.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last September the mayor put forth a plan to take $6 million from the fund and give it to one of his&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/save_sfs_campaign_finance_program_7494&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1101">San Francisco Bay Guardian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7494 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in the Sacramento Bee | &#039;Parties Split Over Teen Voting Bill&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_sacramento_bee_parties_split_over_teen_voting_bill</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...&lt;strong&gt;Steven Hill&lt;/strong&gt; of the nonpartisan &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt; said democracy is not well served by a status quo in which 7 million Californians are eligible to vote but don&#039;t bother to register.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Among the youngest adults, ages 18 to 24, slightly more than half have filed voter applications, the PPIC survey found.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;To get people to vote, the first thing is to get them on the rolls,&amp;quot; Hill said. &amp;quot;If they&#039;re not on the rolls, they can&#039;t vote – end of story...&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/998578.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/263">Sacramento Bee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7451 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California State Controller John Chiang Endorses LA Election Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/california_state_controller_john_chiang_endorses_la_election_reform</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Los Angeles, CA -- California State Controller John Chiang has endorsed a critical election reform for Los Angeles:  Instant Runoff Voting (IRV).  Chiang, California&#039;s top fiscal officer and highest ranking Asian American elected official, announced his support at a City Hall panel discussion held today at Los Angeles City Hall&#039;s Bradley Tower. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Controller Chiang noted that IRV will help boost voter turnout by reducing voter fatigue:  &amp;quot;I think part of the fatigue with the American electoral system is with the runoffs -- with the endless electoral cycles where people do not get time to govern and people don&#039;t get time to&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/california_state_controller_john_chiang_endorses_la_election_reform&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gautam_dutta/recent_work">Gautam Dutta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7265 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA Event: Instant Runoff Voting in Los Angeles</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/ca_event_instant_runoff_voting_los_angeles</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
06/02/2008 - 12:00pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On Monday, June 2nd, the New America Foundation&#039;s Political Reformr Program held an engaging panel discussion and luncheon on instant runoff voting (IRV) in Los Angeles.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is a critical electoral reform for the City of Los Angeles that allows voters to rank a first, second and third choice for each office. IRV elects majority winners in a single election without the expense and voter fatigue of a second election. IRV holds great promise to increase voter turnout while saving taxpayers $8 million dollars each election cycle (source: LA city clerk).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A broad coalition is coming together to support IRV, with endorsements from, amongst others, the League of Women Voters, the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, labor unions, voting rights groups, neighborhood councils and political leaders like former Mayor Richard Riordan, labor leader Dolores Huerta, Anthony Thigpenn, and Antonio Gonzalez.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For more information about IRV in Los Angeles visit the website &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.IRVinLA.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.IRVinLA.org&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/election_reform">Election Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/558">Video</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7209 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cracks In the Foundation</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/cracks_foundation_7100</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain appear anxious to move into the White House, none of them have much to say about housing. Yet rarely a day goes by that the headlines don&#039;t mention the current housing crisis and its threat to the financial markets and the economy. This has led to a strange disconnect between the presidential campaigns and national reality.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Subprime lending and the ensuing foreclosures are being blamed for the crisis, but the problems and blame go much deeper. The fact is, our nation does not have a housing plan, and has not had one for&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/cracks_foundation_7100&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/944">Guardian Unlimited</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/housing">Housing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7100 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Way Out Of the Nader Dilemma</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/way_out_nader_dilemma_6868</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With Ralph Nader in the race, Democrats are fuming and no doubt preparing to use the same legal tricks they used in 2004 to keep Nader off the ballot in many states. Republicans are cackling with glee. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But Republicans shouldn&#039;t cackle too loudly. They&#039;ve also been hurt by the spoiler dilemma.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In fact, the GOP lost control of the U.S. Senate due to Libertarian Party candidates in Montana, Washington, Missouri, Nevada and South Dakota spoiling things for Republicans. And many observers believe that Bill Clinton beat George H.W. Bush in 1992 only because Ross Perot drained away enough votes from Bush.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/way_out_nader_dilemma_6868&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1168">Philadelphia Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6868 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Tuesday Won&#039;t be So Super</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/why_tuesday_wont_be_so_super_6660</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With Super Duper Tuesday looming on Feb. 5, the presidential horse race is about to move into its mid-game. At the end of this process, we may end up with the first president in history who is a woman, or an African American, or a former prisoner of war, or a Mormon or an ordained Southern Baptist minister. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Beyond the headlines and election results, when you lift up the hood of our nation&#039;s nominating process, you see a pretty gnarly sight. There&#039;s nothing simple or easy to understand about it, in fact it has evolved into a complex, chaotic snarl&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/why_tuesday_wont_be_so_super_6660&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/577">Washingtonpost.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6660 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in Newsday | Will Candidates Falter Without Independents?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_newsday_without_independents_will_mccain_obama_falter</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a style=&quot;color: blue&quot; href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-liindy0129,0,1629327.story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Without independents, will McCain, Obama falter? (Newsday)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Certainly, closed primaries are better for those who have a stronger
following among party faithful,&amp;quot; said Steven Hill, the director of the
political reform program for the nonpartisan New America Foundation.
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/63">Newsday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6620 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to Make Primaries Balanced, More Relevant</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/there_must_be_better_way_6577</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the aftermath of Iowa and New Hampshire, many Americans have begun to question the nominating process itself. Are two tiny rural states really the place to kick off an all-important national selection process?

According to a survey conducted for the Associated Press and Yahoo News, fewer than 1 in 5 voters favors Iowa and New Hampshire&#039;s &amp;quot;favored state&amp;quot; status, and nearly 80 percent would rather see other states get their chance at the front of the line.

Officials in those other states fear that if they hold their presidential primary too late in the season, the nominations&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/there_must_be_better_way_6577&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/274">San Francisco Chronicle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6577 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill&#039;s NYT Letter to the Editor Regarding Krugman Column, Europe&#039;s Social Contract</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hills_nyt_letter_editor_regarding_krugman_europes_social_contract</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Paul Krugman calls Europe the &amp;quot;comeback continent&amp;quot; because of its resurging economy, yet repeats another stereotype -- Americans pay less in taxes than Europeans. The situation actually is more complex.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For their taxes, Europeans receive many benefits for which most Americans must pay additional fees and payments out of pocket. Many Americans, if they have health care at all, are paying for escalating premiums and deductibles. Other Americans are saving $100,000 for each of their children&#039;s college education, yet European children attend for free or nearly free.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Millions of Americans are scraping to save the amount they will need for retirement beyond Social Security, but the European retirement system is much more generous. Many Americans pay extra for child care, or self-finance their own sick leave or parental leave after a birth, but Europeans receive all of these (and more) from their taxes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When all these differences are added up, it turns out that many Americans are paying out as much as Europeans -- we just receive a lot less for our money. The &amp;quot;overtaxed European&amp;quot; is another stereotype used to scare Americans away from the European model, so it&#039;s unfortunate that Mr. Krugman reinforced that stereotype.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Steven Hill&lt;br /&gt;
San Francisco
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/welfare">Welfare</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6582 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Trans-Atlantic Clash over Political Economy and Fulcrum Institutions</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/trans_atlantic_clash_over_political_economy_and_fulcrum_institutions_6614</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While the United States and Europe share much in common, they also exhibit basic differences, an &amp;quot;American Way&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;European Way,&amp;quot; that are diverging and had been leading to frequent clashes even before the U.N. rift over Iraq. In a globalized capitalist world, where all nations are seeking models of development that allow &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; for its people, this clash within the West is every bit as elemental as the clash with Arab-Islam because it is multidimensional -- economic, political, social, and international in scope.  Few in the world wish to emulate the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/trans_atlantic_clash_over_political_economy_and_fulcrum_institutions_6614&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1197">Social Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6614 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stop Imposing &#039;Captive Speech&#039; on Employees</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/stop_imposing_captive_speech_employees_6338</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees not only the freedom to speak but also the freedom not to listen. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that &amp;quot;no one has a right to press even good ideas on an unwilling recipient.&amp;quot; Nevertheless, American businesses are increasingly violating the First Amendment freedoms of their employees. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Frito-Lay Inc., one of the world&amp;#39;s largest producers of snack foods, is also one of America&amp;#39;s worst abusers of employees&amp;#39; right not to listen. It routinely not only compels its employees to listen to anti-union diatribes, on company time and property, but also forces&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/stop_imposing_captive_speech_employees_6338&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/167">Providence Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/civil_liberties">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/unions">Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6338 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in Financial Times on California Political Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/steven_hill_financial_times_california_political_reform</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republican candidates are trailing Hillary Clinton in the presidential polls but the revival of a campaign to change the way California allocates its 55 electoral college votes has raised the party&amp;#39;s hopes for next year&amp;#39;s election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The California Counts campaign, which has several prominent Republican backers, wants to replace the &amp;quot;winner-takes-all&amp;quot; system for electoral vote allocation with one based on the number of congressional districts won by each candidate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It would essentially give away 22 electoral college votes that a Democrat candidate could count on [in California],&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Steven Hill&lt;/strong&gt;, director of the political reform programme for the New America Foundation, a non-partisan think-tank. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the proposal is ratified, the number of electoral votes picked up by the Republican candidate could be more than the combined electoral votes of Nevada, Utah and New Mexico. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21793461/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;follow this link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/73">The Financial Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6292 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
