<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Political Reform: The Latest From New America</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/9/policy</link>
 <description>Key Issues - Policy Docs</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Twelve Principles for Fiscal Responsibility</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/twelve_principles_fiscal_responsibility</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The United States faces a number of serious fiscal challenges. Budget deficits are back, the economy has weakened, Social Security is unsound, growing health care spending is putting immense pressure on the budget, tax policy is at a major crossroads, and borrowing is projected to reach unsustainable levels. Politicians will have to take concrete steps to confront these challenges, and some level of sacrifice will be required. The sooner decisions are made, the better-both because it will give the public more time to adjust and because it will allow us to spread the sacrifices more broadly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The presidential campaign can either&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/twelve_principles_fiscal_responsibility&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/marc_goldwein/recent_work">Marc Goldwein</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/paul_mclaughlin/recent_work">Paul McLaughlin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/295">CRFB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/12principles.pdf" length="199678" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fiscal Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7786 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taking Back Our Fiscal Future</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/taking_back_our_fiscal</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The authors of this paper are longtime federal budget and policy experts who have been drawn together by a deep concern about the nation’s long-term fiscal outlook. Our group covers the ideological spectrum. We are affiliated with a diverse set of organizations. We have been meeting informally for over a year, under the auspices of The Brookings Institution and The Heritage Foundation, to define the dimensions and consequences of the looming federal budget problem, examine alternative solutions, and reach agreement on what should be done. Despite our diverse philosophies and political leanings, we have found solid common ground. We&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/taking_back_our_fiscal&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1276">The Brookings Institution and The Heritage Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/TakingBackOurFiscalFuture.pdf" length="122064" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fiscal Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6982 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Voter Education and Outreach in San Francisco to Implement IRV</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/voter_education_and_outreach_san_francisco_irv</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;San Francisco voters approved Proposition A in March 2002 that adopted instant runoff voting (also known as ranked choice voting) to elect local offices in San Francisco. The first election occurred in November 2004. For that election, the Board of Supervisors funded and the Department of Elections conducted a voter education and outreach campaign leading up to the first election. Approximately $750,000 was spent by the Department of Elections to educate the 440,000 registered voters in San Francisco.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete description and evaluation, please see the attached PDF file below. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/sf_irv_outreach_eval.pdf" length="96464" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5937 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instant Runoff Voting for the City of Los Angeles</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting_for_the_city_of_los_angeles</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
Overview  &lt;p&gt;The City of Los Angeles currently uses a two-round runoff system to elect its mayor, city attorney, city council and controller. One election is held in early March, and if no candidate wins a majority of the vote, a second election between the top two finishers is held in May. Voter participation is usually low, with only 10 percent of registered voters participating in the March 6, 2007 election. In addition, LA taxpayers pay millions of dollars for administering the second election. Candidates also must raise funds for a second election, undermining campaign finance reform. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Instant&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting_for_the_city_of_los_angeles&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lynne_serpe/recent_work">Lynne Serpe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Final Report on Instant Runoff Voting for Los Angeles.pdf" length="3003289" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5129 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pre-Registration at Age 16</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/pre_registration_at_age_16</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
THE PROBLEM&lt;p&gt;In California, nearly a third of eligible voters – about 6.7 million Californians – are not registered to vote.Of particular concern is that young people are more negatively impacted by our voter registation system than other demographic groups. In 2004, a presidential election year, just over half of eligible Californians between 18 and 24 years of age were registered to vote (and in nonpresidential elections that rate is even lower). This lack of civic participation is a threat to good governance and a healthy democracy. Current state law limits valuable opportunities for reaching this important and under-represented population.&lt;/p&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;p&gt;Current state&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/pre_registration_at_age_16&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/853">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pre_registration">Pre-Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/universal_voter_registration">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Pre-Registration at Age 16.pdf" length="57432" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4433 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instant Runoff Voting</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting_0</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

Click here for a brief video discussion of this idea.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Americans want a more representative and responsive government capable of addressing the nation&amp;#39;s challenges, yet our electoral system is founded on antiquated practices that inhibit voter choices and encourage a politics of polarization and paralysis. It&amp;#39;s time to bring our electoral system into the 21st century by adopting instant runoff voting (IRV). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IRV elects winners with majority support in a single election by allowing voters to rank a first, second, and third choice on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting_0&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/558">Video</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/NAF_10big_Ideas_9.pdf" length="118082" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4733 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Automatic Voter Registration</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/automatic_voter_registration</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The Problem.  Recent elections underscore the importance of improving the way we register citizens to vote. Our voter rolls are not complete enough, with nearly a third of eligible Californians -- about 6.7 million people -- not registered, a lower percentage than in 2001.This lack of civic participation is a threat to good governance and a healthy democracy. Current state law limits valuable opportunities for engaging more Californians in the electoral process. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;California, like the rest of the United States, is one of the few democracies where the government does not take&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/automatic_voter_registration&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/853">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/universal_voter_registration">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Automatic Voter Registration.pdf" length="65252" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4432 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Universal Voter Registration</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/universal_voter_registration</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California&amp;#39;s strength flows from a willingness to innovate and  improve upon the American experiment in democracy. Recent elections underscore the  importance of revamping the way we register citizens to vote, with the twin goals of  registering all eligible voters and decreasing opportunities for voter fraud. Voter rolls  should be complete and clean.&lt;/p&gt;   The Problem&lt;p&gt;Currently, there are two  widespread failures. First, our voter rolls are not complete enough, with nearly a third of  eligible voters -- about 60 million Americans -- not registered to vote. In California 6.7  million (30 percent) eligible&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/universal_voter_registration&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/853">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/universal_voter_registration">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Universal Voter Registration.pdf" length="126689" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4429 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Proportional Voting</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/proportional_voting</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overview. California’s representative government is plagued by an unprecedented number of noncompetitive elections. The Legislature is highly partisan because over 90 percent of legislative districts strongly favor one political party over the other. Incumbents are not accountable to voters and act without fear of losing re-election. &lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p&gt;In the past, states like Arizona, Iowa and elsewhere have attempted to increase competition with independent redistricting commissions. But in recent years these commissions have proven to be less effective, as Democratic and Republican voters have become increasingly segregated into regional partisan strongholds (known as “red and blue&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/proportional_voting&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/proportional_representation">Proportional Representation</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Proportional Voting.pdf" length="64185" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4428 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instant Runoff Voting: Making Your Vote Count</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
  Overview  &lt;p&gt;California’s winner-take-all electoral system is responsible for polarized politics, a balkanized legislature and declining voter turnout.  Advanced electoral systems like instant runoff voting offer voters the opportunity for better choices at the ballot box, improved political debate and broader-based politics.&lt;/p&gt;The Problem  &lt;p&gt;Loss of Moderates. Party primaries in California empower the political extremes and discourage moderates, creating a Legislature that is unable to reach compromise and is therefore subject to gridlock. Primaries are low turnout elections mostly restricted to registered party voters. Candidates can win their party&amp;#39;s nomination with low percentages of the vote, relying&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/instant_runoff_voting&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Instant Runoff Voting.pdf" length="65011" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4427 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Citizens Assembly</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/citizens_assembly</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
  The Problem   &lt;p&gt;A number of promising reforms have been proposed for making the California political system more representative and responsive— from independent redistricting, term limits, and open primaries to more modern electoral systems and public financing of campaigns—but all face the same obstacle:  entrenched interests, including elected lawmakers, who benefit from the status quo. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;One means of removing partisanship and incumbent protectionism from the political reform process is known as a Citizens Assembly, which convenes a body of average citizens empowered to formally propose electoral reforms that politicians have too strong a conflict of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/citizens_assembly&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/34">Citizens Assembly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/citizens_assembly">Citizens Assembly</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Citizens Assembly.pdf" length="52372" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4426 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
