HIGHEREDWATCH.ORG

Pulling a Bait and Switch on Veterans

August 16, 2007

If you’ve seen an action film this summer, odds are you’ve also seen a slick advertisement touting the benefits of joining the Army or Marines—including help paying for college. You won’t hear the word “Iraq,” and as the Washington Post reported last week, it turns out that college help may not be all it’s cracked up to be.

Although military recruiting literature trumpets educational benefits of up to $72,900, for most recruits the benefit tops out at $38,700. That works out to $1,075 a month for 36 months. It might sound like a lot to a teenager looking for help with college, but it’s only 75 percent of the average cost of attendance at a public four-year-college or university. To be eligible for those benefits, servicemen and women have to contribute $1,200 up front, out of their own pockets, during their first two years of service. Virtually all do so, but nearly one-in-three never collect any educational benefits, and they don’t get a refund. Most important, GI Bill benefits are counted as student financial resources when veterans apply for federal student financial aid, making many veterans ineligible for Pell Grants or subsidized student loans that could fill the gap. For recruits from low-income backgrounds, that’s a huge loss.

As a result, many veterans find their post-service higher education options limited to community college or combining part-time college with a full-time job—both options that dramatically reduce the likelihood they’ll ever get a bachelor’s degree. The Department of Veterans Affairs doesn’t know what percentage of veterans actually complete degree programs, but the fact fewer than 10 percent use all their education benefits suggests it’s low.

The bottom line: our government is essentially pulling a bait-and-switch on the troops. Thousands of young men and women join the military in large part because they think it’s the best chance they’ve got to pay for college. But when their service is over, many find they still can’t afford a four year college education. That’s a far cry from the GI Bill that greeted—and help create—the “greatest generation” after World War II. Patriotic Americans should be deeply offended that, while our leaders send servicemen and women to risk death in Iraq, they won’t spend the money to send them to school when they come home.

Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA), an Iraq veteran, have introduced a bill to raise veterans’ education benefits so they cover the full cost of tuition, room and board, books and fees. Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) has introduced a bill that would cover those costs and also provide full-time student veterans a monthly $1,000 stipend. Both bills would also eliminate the individual contribution benefit.

The Bush administration says the Clinton/Murphy and Webb bills would be too expensive—the Department of Veterans Affairs estimates the Webb bill’s cost at $5.4 billion a year. That’s a lot of money, but far less than the $450 billion we’ve already spent in Iraq, and we should consider the costs of expanding veterans educational benefits as part of our war obligation. We are talking, after all, about people willing to pay everything in service to their country. Surely we can afford to pay for them to go to college.

But there’s a deeper issue here as well—the widening class divide in higher education access. Rising college costs, stagnant aid, and the elimination of high-wage/low-skill jobs have priced many from low-income and working class families out of the public four-year college market (forget about private colleges and universities!), leaving community college, trade school, or the military as their only options for higher education. Meanwhile, affluent parents go to ever greater lengths to get their children into expensive slots at the most elite colleges and universities.

There’s a heartrending contrast between the Post’s veterans story and the cover story in the same paper's issue about affluent students taking a “gap year” between high school and college. Both that article’s subject, Bill Day, and veteran Edwin Cadena were accepted to the University of Virginia as high school seniors. Cadena couldn’t afford to pay the University of Virginia’s costs, so he joined the Marines and served in Iraq. Day wants to play hockey for a NCAA Division I school, so he is deferring for two years to play junior league hockey. There’s little question Day eventually will go on to a four year college, at his parents’ expense. Cadena comes home from Iraq, finds his benefits still won’t cover the costs at the University of Virginia, and ends up living at home taking community college classes. If that’s not a glaring reflection of inequality, we don’t know what is.

Sign Up For Higher Ed Watch E-mails | Return to Main Blog Page

Comments

GI Bill benefits and student aid

I've been the veterans' advisor and financial aid director at my community college for better than twenty years.  You are exactly right about the gap between GI Bill benefits and the cost of most colleges.  But I do have to point out that GI Bill benefits don't affect Pell grant or subsidized loan eligibility.  Colleges do have to recognize GI Bill benefits as a resource available to the student (as we do, for example, a private scholarship), but the value of GI Bill benefits is specifically excluded from the calculation of eligibility for Pell grants and subsidized federal loans.  Unfortunately, even the maximum amounts available from the basic GI Bill, Pell, and a subsidized loan would cover only about a third of a year's cost at a selective private college.   

degrees over-rated

College is just a big racket-a scam.For years I worked in a factory on a production line.  I and my fellow factory workers were always told "if you want to be in managment you have to get a degree." So I did, I have 2 associates degrees from Grand Rapids Community College and a teaching degree from Ferris State University. 15 years experience as skilled trades machinist and assembly line experience. And guess what I did right away after graduating- I applied for every supervisor job under the sun. NOTHING!  Lots and lots of interviews.

I have seen Padnos advertise for a Skilled Trades Manager 5 times during the past year. They stated they are looking for someone with actual experience managing skilled trades people. All BULLSHIT!  College degrees are over rated!  The people who get good jobs are just plain either good looking, or recommended from within or even the CEO's relative.Students just have to look in the mirror literally! if your obese, ugly, over 40, not related to someone rich- your just plain screwed.  The colleges will love to take your money and put you into debt.

Your being assessed and cleverly rejected as management plots to adopt their Ku Klux Klan agenda's example: If you don't have a degree- that will be the excuse for not promoting or hiring you. If you have a degree- you will not have enough recent or relevant experience.

It looks like to be successful, you have to be skinny, good looking and a kiss ass.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.