The Astroturf Lobby
Pity the student loan industry. Even with the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program on the verge of extinction, the industry's plight has not generated grass-roots opposition from anyone other than those who have a vested interest in the program's survival (yes, that includes financial aid administrators who serve on lender and guaranty agency advisory boards and/or belong to state associations that depend heavily on student loan providers for leadership and financial support).
There have not been any angry town hall meetings with citizens raging about a government takeover of this federal program. Students and their parents are not rushing the barricades to demand that lenders be allowed to continue collecting generous subsidies for making virtually risk-free loans.
The indifference of students and their families to President Obama's proposal to kill FFEL shouldn't come as a surprise -- as the terms and conditions of federal student loans are pretty much identical whether they come from the loan industry or from the U.S. Department of Education's Direct Lending program. And despite the loan industry's best efforts, students are not up in arms about losing their ability to choose their own lenders -- because they've never really had much of a choice at all and most really couldn't care less about where their federal loans come from, as long as they get the money on time to pay their college bills. Furthermore, students have never been able to choose between Direct Loans and FFEL, despite the collective misunderstandings of some Senate Republicans, the Heritage Foundation, and The Wall Street Journal. Only colleges and universities can choose which program their respective students borrow under, and it's extremely unlikely that any student has chosen a college based on its participation in either Direct Lending or FFEL.
But just because there hasn't been a groundswell of opposition to the President's plan (and the House bill that would enact it) doesn't mean that loan industry can not try to generate grass roots opposition itself. In a classic case of astroturf lobbying, the lobbying organization America's Student Loan Providers is hosting a "Virtual Hill Day" this week to get "financial aid professionals, [lender and guaranty agency] employees, students, parents, and concerned citizens" to contact all 100 Senators to express their opposition to legislation that would eliminate FFEL. The group has helpfully provided "scripts" for those it wrangles up to speak on its behalf.
At the risk of spreading the industry's messaging further, we have included the scripts below. We thought our readers would be interested to see what lenders are telling people to say:
National Virtual Capitol Hill days
Discussion Guides
No. 1
My name is _____. I'm calling to ask the Senator to vote to protect valuable student loan jobs here in ____.
The guaranteed student loan program has helped families all across the state get a college education. It sponsors free college nights, helps students navigate the financial aid process and works with borrowers to avoid default. Please tell the senator to support student loan reform that preserves options and important services for students, while protecting jobs here in ___. Thank you.
No. 2
My name is __________ and I live in ___________. I'm calling about a student loan proposal that really concerns me.
I think it's a mistake for the government to take over all federal student loans and replace local jobs. The guaranteed student loan program has helped many families in this state get a college education. It also has provided me with a quality job that helps me support my family. In this recession, I can't afford to lose my job.
Please tell the senator to support reform that preserves valuable services for families and protects jobs. Thank you.
No. 3
My name is_____________. I'm calling because I'm worried about my job here in ____. Please tell Senator _____ to vote for a student loan reform plan that preserves competition and choice for students and colleges.
There is a broad coalition supporting a community proposal that builds on the President's plan and delivers billions of dollars for Pell Grants, while also protecting important services for students and families and my job. It's a win for students, taxpayers, and local jobs. Thank you.
No. 4
My name is __________ and I live in __________. I'm very worried about a proposal that would have the federal government take over the student loan program, replacing those like myself who are helping students and families in our State.
I've worked in student loans for __ years and I know first-hand how families benefit from the services [name of organization] provides. With unemployment on the rise, we need to continue these important services.
Please tell the senator that there are alternative reform proposals that preserve these services for students, while protecting jobs like mine. Thank you.
- Login to post comments


















Pity the poor student loan industry?
Please keep in mind that the student loan industry is not entirely made up of bankers living on yachts. It IS made up of middle class Americans concerned about their jobs and the financial security of their families.
Maybe you should just make of video of yourself doing the "superiority dance" and post it here.
That's the same mentality
That's the same mentality the tobacco industry uses. Oh, those poor families and farmers who will lose their livlihoods after cigarettes are taxed to extinction.
Just because an industry is creating jobs does not mean it's a good thing.
I lived in China for a few years. Whenever I went to the public bathroom, I had to buy a ticket from person A. I brought the ticket to person B, who ripped it in half. And then I gave the remaining half to person C at the entrance to the bathroom.
They have 1.3 billion people to find jobs for. Hiring 3 people to do the job of 1 is a very short-term solution (see any similarities with the FFEL?). Where's the long-term strategy? We need to really start focusing on the long-term in this country.
All glory is fleeting NAF!
NAF continues to exceed expectations with regards to stooping to new lows folks! Hey NAF, where was the popular uprising that gave Congress the idea that it was time to eliminate FFELP? I don’t remember millions of Americans attempting to storm the Bastille (AKA: Sallie Mae) looking for Al Lord’s head on a platter. Sorry NAF, but the views of the Project on Student Loan Debt and StudentLoanJustice.Org are hardly grassroots now are they? Go ahead NAF—continue to revel in your lord-of-the-flies moment. As is always the case, the adults will soon be along to clean up your mess.
Supporting Direct
As a former student loan borrower, the last commenter offends me greatly. I also understand that middle class lives will be affected by cuts to FFELP; however, ending FFELP will do far more good than bad. Why not eliminate the middle man. If Republicans actually still were conservative, they would be fighting for the same. I am ashamed at the hypocrisy of a party that I once fought for.
Ending FFELP is actually a conservative move; however the GOP is in bed with the student loan industry and choose not to see it that way. Not that the liberals have it all together... But in this case, I agree with ending FFELP. The only people who disagree are those directly affected by cuts to the existing program. Sorry, but for the greater good FFEL needs to end.
Pity the poor middleman
Borrower, if we eliminate the middlemen, who will run the Direct Loan program? Civil servants with poli sci degrees from Berkeley?
The middleman
Yes, there will still be some middlemen. However, the corrupt private banking industry will have much less influence over student's lives. Why should the federal government pay middlemen and guarantee their loans if they can do it themselves?