Higher Ed Watch - logo
 

Important News for College Graduates

June 10, 2008 - 11:30am

Attention recent college graduates: starting July 1st, you will have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to significantly reduce your federal student loan costs. We at Higher Ed Watch are telling you this, because if some in the student loan industry get their way, you may never hear about it.

For six months beginning July 1st, members of the Class of 2008 who have taken out variable interest rate federal student loans will have the opportunity to refinance those loans and lock in a low, fixed 3.61 percent interest rate. That's about 3 percentage points lower than the variable rate that was set last year. This is the biggest one year drop in student loan interest rates ever, and the 4th lowest interest rate in the 15 year history of the student loan consolidation program.

All borrowers with non-consolidation federal student loans that were issued before July 2006 [when the interest rate on new student loans changed to a fixed rate of 6.8 percent] can save big money by refinancing their debt after July 1st of this year. But it is the most recent graduates who can get the lowest rate by consolidating variable interest rate federal student loans during their post-graduation, six month grace period that takes place before student loan repayment begins.

A typical member of the Class of 2008, for example, with $17,125 in federal student loan debt can be expected to save approximately $2,542 in lifetime student loan repayment costs if they consolidate in the second half of this calendar year, assuming their loans' current variable interest rate of 7.2 percent is their approximate average interest rate over the next 15 years (the maximum repayment term for a consolidation loan under $20,000). Variable interest rates go up and down from year to year, whereas a new consolidation loan interest rate is fixed at 3.61 percent.

There's a catch. Because of subsidy cuts that Congress made last year and liquidity problems due to the credit crunch, most private lenders have stopped making consolidation student loans, which are necessary for the refinancing boon to borrowers. As a result, private lenders have little incentive to make students aware of the opportunity offered elsewhere (they don't want to lose your business), and given past behavior, are likely to try to actively dissuade students from refinancing.

In fact, this is particularly true this year since most borrowers who wish to consolidate their federal student loans are most likely to do so through the U.S. Department of Eduction's competing Direct Student Loan program. Can we really expect the student loan giant Sallie Mae to actively encourage its borrowers to seek Direct Consolidation Loans -- when such a move will require Sallie Mae to lose out on years of interest payments?

If you have any doubt, just listen to what Martha Holler, a Sallie Mae spokeswoman told TheStreet.com during a recent interview on the subject. "There is no immediate need to consolidate as the new rates will be in effect for the next year and many other options, such as extended and graduated plans, exist to help borrowers manage student loan repayment, " she stated. No matter that these other repayment programs don't reduce the cost of the loans for borrowers, and in fact, under the extended repayment program, actually increase a borrowers' lifetime costs by stretching out the loan repayment period over many, many years.

All of this is to say that the onus for alerting recent graduates of this great opportunity lies squarely with the U.S. Department of Education and other public officials. Unfortunately, the Department has a weak record of marketing and promoting the Direct Loan program. In addition, loan industry officials are likely to put the Department under tremendous pressure to play down this cost-saving option for borrowers. There's little doubt that lenders will play the "credit crunch card" with policymakers -- warning them that the potential loss of borrowers to direct lending, on top of the turmoil created by the credit crisis, could cripple them.

The Department must resist this pressure. It must also be prepared to penalize lenders that prevent borrowers from refinancing their loans. One way that lenders have done this has been by refusing to complete the loan verification certificates (LVC) that allow a loan to be shifted from one lender to another. While the Department has issued guidance to lenders to clarify the rules regarding LVCs, the agency's own Inspector General has faulted it for failing to take action against lenders who continually refuse to comply with the rules. "When a loan holder fails to return an LVC timely, or fails to provide all of the information requested on the LVC, the Department does not take effective action to ensure that the applicant's loan is consolidated," according to a 2005 Inspector General report.

The Department and other public officials need to move quickly to ensure that recent graduates are aware of this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and to alert lenders that it won't allow them to block borrowers from refinancing their loans. Department officials must remember that the point of the federal student aid is not to protect lenders' profits, but to make college more accessible and affordable for the millions of students who benefit from these programs.

 

Note: Stephen Burd and Michael Dannenberg with Higher Ed Watch contributed to this post.

Another Way?

There could be another way to get the word out. Encourage Mr. Philip Day of the NASFAA to promote consolidation for new graduates within his constituency. It would be a way for him show his enthusiasm for the profession, and show his independence from the banking influence on his organization. - TL

If someone in the class of

If someone in the class of 2008 has variable rate loans, they probably have fixed rate loans as well - that said, the weighted average rate on their loans will not be as low as you state.

The need to "lock-in" variable rate loans at a "lower" rate wouldn't be necessary if Congress had not switched the rates from variable to fixed in the first place.

There are other options besides loan consolidation when it comes to repayment and student loan portfolio management.

Response: There are a lot of numbers

There are a lot of numbers floating out there, ready to confuse students. So just to be clear, these are our assumptions:

If a student in the Class of 2008 borrowed the maximum in subsidized Stafford loans each year, they have loans with the following balances and interest rates:

For the academic years 2004-05 and 2005-06, $6,125 in loans at a variable interest rate.

For the academic years 2006-07 and 2007-08, $11,000 in loans at the fixed 6.8 percent rate.

Beginning July 1, 2008, students can consolidate the first two years of loans at the new 3.61 percent interest rate; the last two years remain at the fixed rate. Put together, the consolidated package yields a weighted interest rate of 5.75 percent. Assuming that rates on the variable rate loans average the current 7.2 percent for the next 15 years, the expected savings from consolidating during the grace period will be about $2,542.

NOTE: An earlier post undertstated the savings from loan consolidation. It also incorrectly showed a 20-year repayment period when a maximum 15-year repayment is allowed for a consolidation loan with a balance between $10,000 and $20,000. We have updated the post to reflect the correct numbers. Readers should check the savings for their own loans using a calculator on the Direct Loan website here https://loanconsolidation.ed.gov/loancalc/servlet/common.mvc.Controller?controller_task=startCalculator

Not Surprising....

Now that Tom Joyce has been kicked upstairs, it falls to Martha Holler at SLM Corp. to spread the company line. The fact that they and others in the student debt cartel are going out of their way to create this "credit crisis" shows how unnecessary the for-profit, rent-seeking entities really are in the student financing area.

Direct Consolidation Capacity

Does the direct loan program have the processing capacity to handle all these direct loan consolidation applications on top of all the new FFEL loans they are taking on. My guess would be no - they are not prepared. The direct loan program is going to have to spend a lot of money to ramp up to consolidate a lot of loans that are not profitable - for anyone, including the DOE. It is a very expensive program and the direct loan program is going to become much more expensive to operate than it has in the past - leaving the DOE to turn to private lenders to get in to help with processing and to share in the costs.

Ramping up?

Direct loan consolidation "ramped up" from $7 billion in volume in 2004 to $16 billion in 2005 to $20 billion in 2007. 2007 was only $3 billion volume, so it would appear there would currently be a lot of available capacity. Private lenders have been processing direct loans all along; they are signed as federal contractors. In addition, the FFEL loans DoEd would be "purchasing" under the new law would be a different process, not related to the process of loan consolidation; how would that possibly impact consolidation capacity? While borrowers from schools like Univ. of Michigan are unlikely to default, the subset that consolidates are even less likely to default, perhaps because they are taking an active role in their financial planning. The consolidation discount offered in 2000-01 made money by inducing volume from a higher cost program to a lower cost program. Consolidation loans have always been profitable for direct loan. See as one example, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06195.pdf . The exception is the subgroup of consolidations that consist of defaulted FFELP loans. Even there, there is a wrinkle, because CBO assigns the poor performance of the subsequent consolidations to the original FFELP program accounts; CBO interprets the federal credit reform act of 1990 to treat consolidation as a repayment plan option on the original Stafford and PLUS loan, rather than a whole new loan, as OMB does. If you were a credit bureau, would you consider the borrower's debt to be zero just because he consolidated? Of course not. There is a continued debt until the borrower's debt as a whole is paid down. CBO's interpretation makes sense. A common-sense way to solve the 9.5% dilemma a couple years back would have been to consolidate FFELP loans associated with those special allowance rates into DL.

re: Direct Loan Consolidation and Citibank

My Lender, Citibank, tried very hard to prevent me from having them send my LVC (Loan Verification Certificate) to the Direct Loan Program for reconsolidation. After several phone calls, and several conversations with both Citibank's ombudsman and the Department of Education's ombudsman, they finally released the LVC. At first, they continually claimed that they never heard of the "reconsolidation" program through Direct Loans; later on they asked me to ask the Department of Education about my eligibility. In short, it is a disgrace that lenders like Citibank treat a Student Loan (education should be a right, not a privilege) like a business loan.

I have also had a nightmare

I have also had a nightmare of a situation with Citibank refusing to accept a check from Direct Loan to complete my consolidation. Citibank is making it impossible for me to get this reconsolidation to go through. I'm currently in the process of trying to work this out, but shame on Citibank for making this so difficult!! They are ignoring the laws and have stated that they are refusing the consolidation because they "need a reason" as to why I am consolidating, when the law has clearly changed and they need no reason. I am so peeved about this entire situation.

Post new comment

Please note that comments are reviewed by an editor prior to publication. We welcome all relevant critiques, feedback and counterarguments, but comments that are profane, offensive, off-topic or blatantly commercial will not be published.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for weeding out automated spam submissions.