The New Health Dialogue

Can health reform heal our federal budget? Yes, but whatever passes now is just the beginning, and there will always be room for improvement.

That's our takeaway from an excellent event we tweeted this morning hosted by the US Budget Watch, a joint project between the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and The Pew Charitable Trusts.

There was a lot of ground covered by a panel of experts moderated by the Washington Post's Ceci Connolly and featuring New America's director of health policy Len Nichols. They tackled everything from raising Medicaid eligibility rates to fixing the Sustainable Growth Rate formula in a fiscally responsible way. But for now, we'll just give you the highlights of the discussion.

After all the sound and fury of last August, we're pleasantly surprised that the right hasn't risen again with all sorts of horror stories about the resurrection, so to speak, of the "death panels." Maybe because all that fear-mongering was finally discredited. Maybe we are finally getting just a little bit smarter.

The inevitable focus on the politics of health reform, and the disproportionate amount of attention paid to the public plan, sometimes obscures the many ways that the House and the Senate health plans are ambitious. Not perfect. Ambitious. I've heard experts, people I like and respect, say the legislation does "nothing" to advance the cause of quality of end of life care in America. They are wrong. The House and Senate bill each contain measures that would advance that cause -- not fix it completely, far from it, but they will take us important steps in the right direction. It's too soon to know which of these measures - if any -- will survive a final melding of House and Senate legislation. But let's look at them here because, except for the end of life consults which got way too much of the wrong kind of attention, they haven't gotten adequate attention. In an accompanying guest post. Dr. Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in New Hampshire, talks about what these changes can mean for his patients and their families.

We just posted on some of the measures within the House and Senate bills that may help lead us to improved care for people at the end of life. Here, Dr. Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., returns as a guest poster to tell us what it all means for his patients -- and the doctors who treat them. Byock, the author of Dying Well, has written for us before about the need to think more broadly about what kind of changes we need in our health care system -- and our communities -- to do a better job of caring for sick and frail people trying to get by in their homes.

Will be tweeting an event from US Budget Watch, a joint project between the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and The Pew Charitable Trusts, asking whether health reform fix our fiscal problems (Tag: #budget). Len Nichols, the director of New America's Health Polciy Program will be participating in the discussion along with a panel of experts on health care and fiscal policy. Things are about to get going, but in the meantime you can check out the two most recent papers from U.S. Budget Watch:  Evaluating Health Care Plans and Comparing Health Care Plans. 

Today was a big day for the House's health reform efforts.

The AARP, the American Medical Association and the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network publicly announced their support for the Affordable Health Care For America Act (H.R. 3972) (and, particularly for the doctors, the Medicare Physician Payment Reform Act (H.R. 3961) aka the "doc fix.")

Today was the first time that the AARP has put its "full weight behind a comprehensive health reform package," the AARP statement says. "We started this debate more than two years ago with the twin goals of making coverage affordable to our younger members and protecting Medicare for seniors," said AARP CEO Barry Rand. "We've read the Affordable Health Care for America Act and we can say with confidence that it meets those goals with improved benefits for people in Medicare and needed health insurance market reforms to help ensure every American can purchase affordable health coverage."

Last night, the Congressional Budget Office released a preliminary analysis of the House Republican health care bill. The bill focuses mostly on cost and repackages a lot of the conservative ideas that have been around for years (and never came to fruition even while Republicans held the torch.)

According to the CBO, by 2019, the Republican bill would only extend health coverage to three million more Americans and reduce the federal deficit by $68 billion. In comparison, by 2019, the House Democratic bill would insure 36 million more Americans and reduce the federal deficit by $104 billion.

In case you missed the ‘Space' section of your daily paper a few months ago, two planets -- one the size of Mercury and one the size of our Moon -- collided in a far off solar system.  The smaller planet went the way of Alderaan. The larger planet suffered a big dent.

My own worlds collided this week when former-professor-in-my-department Kelly Devers teamed up with my former boss (on a research project) and friend-of-the-blog Robert Berenson to publish a thoughtful critique of the panacea fever surrounding Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  As much as we have trumpeted ACOs as the best cure-all since Clark Stanley's Snake Oil Liniment, Drs. Devers and Berenson's thoughtful analysis published by RWJF is a welcome contribution to the dialogue.

David Rogers, now with POLITICO, formerly of the Wall Street Journal, may be the least chatty reporter in Washington (trust me, I sat about 5 feet away from him for 12 years in the Senate Press Gallery... although I suppose if you averaged his taciturnity with my extroversion, you would have had two average chat-ers). He's also one of the best and clearest-thinking. He has institutional memory and historical context often lacking in the 24/7 rush-rush of much of the media today. So while so many people are hyperventilating about whether two off-year GOP gubernatorial wins will spell doom for health reform, David comes up with this reassuring and well-reported story, "Dems want to seize historic moment."

Health care is big for House Democrats: big like Social Security in the '30s and civil rights in the '60s, big like the war stories retold now in party caucuses as lawmakers grapple with the floor vote that is just days away.

All politicians live in the present -- or risk perishing, as seen Tuesday night. But history also sits on the shoulders of Democrats these days, and having failed to act on health care in 1994 -- and then having lost power -- they feel an almost inexorable push to seize this moment before it slips away.

The AP reports that the AARP is ready to announce it's support for the Democratic health reform legislation in the House. The endorsment from the influential retiree's lobby should provide a big boost as House Democrats are expected to vote on H.R. 3962 Saturday evening. Streaming video of the AARP announcement, set to begin at 11:30 a.m., is available below.

Meanwhile, the American Medical Association will announce it's position on the House bill's at 12 p.m. More on that after we get off the call.

Residents of D.C. love to talk about their Safeways. Apparently, so do Members of Congress.

During the mark up of Senate Finance Committee's bill in September, Senators John Ensign (R-NV) and Tom Carper (D-DE) introduced an amendment that increased the financial rewards companies could offer their workers for meeting certain health goals and criteria such as losing weight, lowering their cholesterol or quitting smoking. Pushing hard for this change, were companies like Safeway which puts a great deal of stock in their efforts to help manage and improve their employee's health, as explained this week in by the LA Times:

Nationwide, 25,000 nonunion employees in Safeway's health insurance plan are eligible for the premium-reduction program, most of them in California. The company says that 74% have signed up.

Once a year, participants submit to tests of four health risk factors: smoking, obesity, blood pressure and cholesterol. If they pass all four, they receive a $780 annual discount, which is 20% of the total cost of their insurance. If they do not pass initially but make progress in some areas -- quitting smoking or losing 10% of their weight -- they can get a premium rebate.